|
This little layout has been around for about 18 years now. It is
like "Adam's axe" in that almost everything has been improved and
replaced several times over.
The name stems from my German Great-Grandmother's surname, which
was altered to Shuker in 1914 to sound less German, in what was at
that time a very anti-German country. I have yet to find what the
original name was that sounded more German! (Zucker perhaps?)
At the time it was first built, we had a very small house with a
spare room 9'3" x 7'4". This had to be a workshop and household
storage room first and a model railway room second.
My first 2 rail layout filled one side but lacked any industries
to originate goods traffic. There was a space across the end wall
above the work-bench which functioned as a place to "put things
down", just the place for a removable baseboard section if things
could be cleared away first.
MkI.
A baseboard 42" x 12" (1065mm x 305mm) was constructed in
two halves, designed to create a 533mm x 305mm x305mm box when closed.
The track layout (see plan) had the incoming track close to the
backscene to match the connecting track to the main layout and this
section had a slight gradient so that wagons could not be left there
to foul the main line.
The maximum train size was a 3 axle locomotive and 3x 100mm length
wagons. The train would arrive from the right and travel to the left
hand head shunt. It would then set back into the run around track.
From there the wagons could be moved individually to their individual
industry tracks, and another 3 wagons brought together to form an
outbound train. This often formed an intricate puzzle taking an hour
or more to accomplish!
The track was laid using second-hand Lima steel rail trackwork, all
trimmed to much reduced spacing. With our second child just born,
there was no money for better quality materials. The limitation of
only 3 axle locomotives was a bad decision as these models tend to be
the cheapest and worst operating of most ranges. the only acceptably
operating model in my collection being the Piko Class 89.262
ex Saxony tank. The alloy tyres became dirty very quickly, requiring
frequent cleaning.
Mk II.
The main layout was unsatisfying and was soon demolished, allowing a modification
to be made. A strip of 75 x 25mm timber was added across each end to allow
larger locomotives such as the Fleischmann BR64. 2.6.2 Tank. (1'C 1') The
new overall dimensoins became 1105mm x 305mm. Some trackwork was replaced
with second-hand nickel-silver rail also. An add-on section was made so
that the layout could be operated without being attached to a bigger layout.
Operation was now much more satisfactory.
Brewery.
Mk
III Oil Depot and exit track.
Mk III.
While the new major layout was being constructed, the Shukerbahn
was used infrequently. After one spell, the layout could not be
made to function properly, in spite of considerable effort at
cleaning the trackwork. The track was ripped up and a new track
layout was devised. All the steel rail trackwork was discarded and
more used nickel-silver track acquired. A new track layout was
designed to bring the entry track to a more central position and
to give the option of entry from either end. The warehouse
building at the left rear remained.
Mk IV.
In 1984 the limitation of locomotive size was becoming a problem
as I had few suitable small models. Again, extra strips of timber
were added to increase the head-shunt track lengths.
The baseboard now measured 1150mm x 305mm. The main layout was
again to be demolished, so the Shukerbahn gained a lot of
improvements in a short period of time.
In 1984 I was transfered to Christchurch, so the layout along with
my railway collection was put in my campervan. I had 5 months of
unsettled residence so the layout stayed on the back seat for that
time. I met a fellow in a model-shop with obviously similar
interests. The conversation went as you would expect until it
reached the stage of: "would you like to see my layout?"
"I haven't much time to spare, is it far away?"
"No, it is just outside the shop door!"
This reply produced a look of complete disbelief, especially as he
had trailed me into the shop and was certain he would have noticed
me depositing a model railway against the wall.
While the position of the layout resolved these doubts, I never
did overcome the reputation for being slightly eccentric with layouts.
The main layout in my home was housed in a 34' x 17' garage, shared
with two cars. The Shukerbahn quickly became the branch terminus
which allowed operating to begin very early.
Another move in 1992 brought this major layout to an end.
11/1993. I had for a number of years been involved in our local
model railway exhibitions. We had a good selection of layouts but
they were all based on ovals of track with trains circulating.
I thought that it was time to show some operation to the public.
By constructing a fiddle yard and adding a friend's (Blair Nauman)
scenic diorama to a centre module, we had an operating shunting
layout set up in a short space of time. I must admit that two days
of shunting operation tends to reduce the brain to a mush like state!
Mk V. Following the 1993 Exhibition, we set up standards for a "Branch Line Modular System" based on 1200mm long modules. (New Zealand having gone Metric, our sheet boards are mostly 1200 x 2400mm, making 1220mm (4 foot) modules untidy at the ends). The Schukerbahn was rebuilt on a 1200mm x 450mm base, still with the same operating restrictions, but with an extra siding. (The name became longer because the layout did :-) A further siding (T16)was added later. (This was a 66% increase in size compared to Mk I.)
Enough extra modules (5) were constructed to
exhibit an oval modular layout for 1994. Some of the baseboards
from the garage layout were utilised for these modules.
10/1996. The Schukerbahn was pulled out from the cobwebs at the
back of the garage and refurbished, along with a fiddle yard
section to display my very new and underdeveloped computer/model
railway control system at the exhibition. After 30 minutes, the
computer died and the layout reverted to manual operation :-(
I concluded that the 1992 configuration was better as the scenic
module allowed a short mental break while the trains were rolling.
7/1997. The Schukerbahn now has the beginnings of a new main
layout to be the branchline terminus of.
Watch for a report of the "Golden Spike" about the year 2000. In
the meantime, it has the largest and most strangely configured
fiddle-yard ever! ;-)
(It joins on, half way down a double track spiral)
The Shukerbahn has now been connected to 5 main home layouts, plus
4 different fiddle yards and 3 different exhibition
configurations.
Back to Home-page.